The
systematics and phylogeny of the Stylonurina (Arthropoda:
Chelicerata: Eurypterida)
James
C. Lamsdell1, Simon J. Braddy1,
and O. Erik Tetlie2
1 Department of Earth Sciences, University
of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, BRISTOL
BS8 1RJ
2 Sandmoen Østre, N-7863 Overhalla,
Norway
The first well-resolved phylogeny of stylonurine eurypterids
(i.e., 30 taxa, 58 characters) is presented, prompting a
taxonomic revision at the familial and superfamilial level.
The monophyletic suborder Stylonurina consists of four Superfamilies:
Rhenopteroidea, Stylonuroidea, Kokomopteroidea and Hibbertopteroidea.
The enigmatic hibbertopterids – large sweep-feeding
forms form the Carboniferous to end-Permian – are
therefore demonstrated to be an in-group Stylonurina clade,
within Eurypterida, in contrast to some earlier hypotheses.
Furthermore, the genus Drepanopterus is shown to
be polyphyletic: ‘Drepanopterus’ bembycoides
is transferred to Moselopteridae fam. nov. along with Moselopterus
and Vinetopterus at the base of the Eurypterina,
defined by their possession of a pediform appendage VI bearing
a modified podomere 7a. Evolution towards a sweep-feeding
mode of life occurred independently in stylonuroids and
hibbertopteroids, involving either multiple rows of fixed
spines on the prosomal appendages (in stylonuroids) or paired
movable flattened spines (‘blades’) on the prosomal
appendages alongside a posteriorly cleft metastoma and coxal
laden (in hibbertopteroids). The Stylonurina have a relatively
poor fossil record (RCI 15%), when compared to more derived
Eurypterina clades (e.g., Adelophthalmoidea RCI 66%; Pterygotoidea
RCI 53%), but is relatively more complete than basal Eurypterina
clades (RCI -21%). The fit between phylogeny and stratigraphical
occurrences of stylonurid taxa is good (SCI 0.65 and GER
0.77, with only 0.3% of 1,000 randomisation tests yielding
greater congruence; GER* 0.995), and generic-level collector
curves of the Stylonurina and Eurypterina show no major
discrepancies in their sampling histories. These differences
could be explained by geographic collection bias, taxa having
different habitat preferences (and hence fossilisation potential),
and ontogenetic factors: these results support previous
suggestions that stylonurine eurypterids are oversplit.
Key
words: Palaeozoic, Eurypterid, Relative Completeness,
Sweep-feeding, Moselopteridae, Cladistics.
|